Home โ€บ Wet Cat Food โ€บ Kitten Chicken Formula Au Jus
Weruva

Kitten Chicken Formula Au Jus

๐Ÿฒ Wet Cat Food Cats 27 ingredients listed

Compare with another product

Product Score ยท Good

A solid product overall. The score is held back mostly by evidence confidence.

Six categories, each weighted. Every point is accounted for below โ€” open any line to see exactly where it came from.

This is a score for a label, not for an animal. It measures how well this product explains itself, not whether it will suit your pet.

How this number was reached
โ€บ Ingredient Quality ร—30% 92

What the food is actually built from โ€” named whole proteins near the top, or generic meals and fillers.

  • Chicken is the first ingredient and is a named whole protein. That is the strongest single signal on a label. +20
  • One ingredient names its animal source: Chicken. +4
  • 4 ingredients are well regarded in published references. +8
  • Starting from a neutral 60, this comes to 92.
โ€บ Additives of Concern ร—25% 100

Preservatives, artificial colours, and sweeteners that published references flag as worth avoiding.

  • No preservatives, artificial colours, or sweeteners of concern appear on this label. Full marks.
โ€บ Transparency ร—15% 85

Whether the label names its sources honestly, or hides behind generic terms and split ingredients.

  • Publishes a complete ingredient list. +40
  • Every animal ingredient names its species. Nothing is hiding behind "meat" or "animal". +20
  • Uses catch-all terms that can cover unnamed ingredients: Natural Flavor. +0
  • No sign of ingredient splitting. +15
  • Publishes a guaranteed analysis, so the protein and fat numbers can be checked. +10
  • Adds up to 85 out of 100.
โ€บ Nutritional Adequacy ร—10% 100

Whether the maker states this food is complete and balanced, and publishes the numbers to back it.

  • States that it is complete and balanced to AAFCO nutrient profiles. That means it is formulated to be fed as a whole diet. +70
  • Publishes a guaranteed analysis with minimum protein and fat. +30
  • Adds up to 100 out of 100.
  • This measures what the label CLAIMS. We do not test the food, and an AAFCO statement is a formulation claim, not proof of quality.
โ€บ Manufacturer Information ร—10% 80

How easy it is to find out who made this and how to reach them.

  • +30 โ€” the brand has a working public website.
  • +25 โ€” publishes direct contact information.
  • +25 โ€” discloses where the product is made (United States).
  • +0 โ€” no meaningful detail about manufacturing.
โ€บ Evidence Confidence ร—10% 52

How much published information exists about these ingredients. Low confidence is not a warning โ€” it means we know less.

  • This measures how much published information exists about these ingredients โ€” it is a note about our own certainty, not a judgment of the product.
  • Of 27 ingredients: 5 well documented, 1 moderately documented, 21 thinly documented.
  • A lower number here means read the rest of this page with more skepticism, ours included.
Weighted total 89 / 100

This score rates the label โ€” what's disclosed and what the ingredients are โ€” not real-world performance. A well-labeled product can still disappoint a particular pet, and a plainly-labeled one can work beautifully. Treat the number as a starting point for questions, not a verdict.

What's in it

In label order โ€” the first is the most abundant
01
Named muscle-meat protein; high-quality primary protein source
One of the more commonly reported food allergens in dogs, largely because it's such a widely used ingredient. Relevant only for dogs with a diagnosed chicken sensitivity โ€” not a concern for most.
evidence: high
Beneficial
02
evidence: low
Neutral
03
Palatability enhancer to improve taste
A non-specific term โ€” it doesn't disclose the exact source of the flavoring. Generally safe, but less transparent than a named flavor like "chicken liver flavor."
evidence: moderate
Neutral
04
evidence: low
Neutral
05
evidence: low
Neutral
06
evidence: low
Neutral
07
Natural thickener and stabilizer, common in wet food and gravies
evidence: high
Neutral
08
evidence: low
Neutral
09
evidence: low
Neutral
10
Source of omega-3 fatty acids (EPA/DHA) for skin, coat, and joint health
evidence: high
Beneficial
11
Essential nutrient; source of choline for liver and nervous-system function
evidence: high
Beneficial
12
Essential amino acid supporting heart and vision, especially in cats
evidence: high
Beneficial
13
evidence: low
Neutral
14
evidence: low
Neutral
15
evidence: low
Neutral
16
evidence: low
Neutral
17
evidence: low
Neutral
18
evidence: low
Neutral
19
evidence: low
Neutral
20
evidence: low
Neutral
21
evidence: low
Neutral
22
evidence: low
Neutral
23
evidence: low
Neutral
24
evidence: low
Neutral
25
evidence: low
Neutral
26
evidence: low
Neutral
27
evidence: low
Neutral

The short version

In its favour

  • Built around well-regarded ingredients: Chicken, Fish Oil, Choline Chloride.
  • Publishes a complete ingredient list.
  • Chicken is the first ingredient and names its animal source.
  • No preservatives, colours, or sweeteners of concern on the label.
  • States it is complete and balanced to AAFCO nutrient profiles.
  • Publishes a guaranteed analysis.
  • Prints feeding directions and transition guidance.
  • Discloses where it is made (United States).
  • The maker publishes contact information.

Against it

  • Uses catch-all label terms that can hide unnamed ingredients.
  • Some ingredients are thinly documented, so our confidence here is lower than usual.

Who makes it

Weruva

No additional information published.

โœ“ Public website โœ“ Contact published โœ“ Made in United States โœ— Manufacturing undisclosed

Scores higher in Wet Cat Food

Higher score โ‰  better for your pet
Spotted something wrong on this page? Report an error

Read this before you trust the number

This application is intended for educational purposes only. Scores are generated using publicly available product information and are not veterinary advice. We are not veterinarians. Always consult your veterinarian regarding medical decisions.

A high score does not mean a product is right for your pet, and a low score does not mean it is dangerous. An individual animal can react to an ingredient that scores well here, and a product with a mediocre score may be exactly what your vet recommends.

The score reads ingredients one at a time. It cannot account for how ingredients interact with each other, with other products you use, or with your pet's medications and conditions. Two ingredients that are each fine on their own may not be fine together. A score is a starting point for questions, not a substitute for professional judgment.